Of course, if the market discounts
their prices accordingly, because of market equilibrium, they would again
become equal or in parity with others stocks, relating return and risk
according to price. But I guess I estimate that the market has not fully
discounted these stocks and they remain a bad buy or a bad holding.
I have a bond fund FAGIX that has outperformed
all the stocks I have over the last 10-12 years, plus it pays about a 5%
dividend (yield). So what I did was as the Dow reached 12,700 I felt it was time
to sell. I began selling $15,500 in those stocks of mine and buying the FAGIX
as the market dropped. It was a double-win, because as the market was dropping
I had unloaded some equities, plus even thought the FAGIX that I was buying was
dropping, I was doubling-down and buying more near the bottom. Problem is, I
did not gauge the bottom. It dropped out, pretty much, as you know, and I did
not anticipate that.
And yet, I am still better off for
three things: getting rid of $15,500 in badly performing stocks, buying the
FAGIX bonds at increasingly better prices and gaining the additional dividends,
which add about $70 a month to my interest income.
I still feel that it helped me a lot to
set parameters for my investing. That I think was the best thing I did. That
should be first and foremost in everything I continue to do. Lay out a strategy
and follow it. Then when things get crazy, I do not lose my perspective. Also,
set very defined and limited goals for what I want to achieve, and stick to
them. Then like a gambler who need to know when to walk away, stay in control:
take my winnings or take my losses, and prepare to start again. These will be
my Rules of Engagement for the
future.
I am not satisfied with my portfolio,
and I still want to buy more bonds. I can't buy any more because I ran out of
cash. I need to wait until the market recovers and start again, by selling some
equities again. I don't want to sell those now at these depressed prices. But I
think the market will recover because it always does.
Part of playing this game is forcing
myself to think the opposite of the
market. When everybody else is panicking and selling, that is probably the
best time to buy, and vice versa. When everybody is in a buying fever, that is
probably a good signal to sell.
But these are generalizations.
Specifically, if/ when the Dow recovers to 12,500, I will sell some more, maybe
$5000. If/ when it hits 12,600 I will sell $5000 more and 12,700 $5000. Then I
will sit with $15,000 and wait for a market fluctuation. Even though I could
just place it in my bonds right away, it will not hurt me to wait 30-60 days to
see if I can get a better price.
One key for me has been that my bonds
seem to fluctuate a lot less than the stocks. They are, in that sense, a more
conservative investment. And yet, they drop a lot when things get very bad, but
most of the time they have about 1/5 the volatility of the stocks. I do not yet
know how to buy individual stocks. I do, in a sense, but I guess I feel they
are not a good investment for me.
Since I was a finance and investment major, I have studied analysis. It is complex and tricky. Plus
you can get lost in the trees and not see the forest. And, of course, there is
always the risk of bankruptcy. Finally there are wizards all over the world
using advanced mathematics, complex algorithms, in-depth analysis, computer
modeling and insider trading that I have to compete with. I am not convinced
yet that I stand a chance against that kind of competition.
In conclusion,
the only thing that appears to be working for me is watching the swings in the
broad market. The trick is not getting caught up in the emotions of the moment
and remembering that when the market is down, it usually goes back up, and when
it is up, it usually goes back down, but it trends upwards in the long run. The
best time to buy is when the political news is bad, because it causes the
market to drop, but it does not change the market fundamentals of company
performance, at least immediately.
No comments:
Post a Comment